Every binary nucleus in Jabal's lexicon, read through its trilateral family of derived words. One methodology, applied uniformly. Everything in one place.
No more "promoted" versus "published". Both have to earn the verdict through the same word-evidence pass.
Same rule for every nucleus. The numbers below tell the truth without category-laundering.
The trilateral family clusters around one semantic axis. The composed reading earns the family clean.
The family shows two recurring patterns — both inward AND outward modes active. Dual-face by evidence.
Word evidence too thin to commit. Next priority for word-list expansion.
For each letter: faces shown in actual word evidence, faces documented in the vault, and how many nuclei the letter participates in. Where evidence exceeds vault, that's a refinement candidate (see next section).
For each underdocumented letter: current vault charge, proposed second face in vault style, and concrete nuclei activating each face with Quranic words.
Three of each verdict type, with their actual derived words and Qurʾānic refs visible.
Click any row to see the full word ecology. Filter buttons restrict to a verdict type.
Each was diagnosed manually. All four now have either a promoted reading (via a letter dual-face refinement) or a methodological explanation.
The family is internally coherent around two-ness folding inward / fine accumulation held (ثنى = folding into bends; ثنن = interiorization of fine particles; وثن = the held-erected thing). The original grading read ن as outward emission only, but ن's published «رَنين + انبِعاث» phrasing already encodes two physical phases: the رَنين (cavity-held resonance, in-place ringing) comes BEFORE any emission. When the first letter is itself fine/granular (ث), the family activates the رَنين face, giving 'fine spread folded into a held interior'. This is not a new variant — it is a recognition that ن's existing phrasing carries two semantic axes, exactly like ب, ع, ف already do in the consensus table.
Single member ضهأ axial = «خلو الشيء مما يتميز به عن غيره» (emptied of what distinguishes it). The original grading punted on data sparsity, but the composition does work if ه is read as physically what it is: the only Arabic letter that's pure exhale, the breath that PASSES THROUGH and CARRIES AWAY. ه's published «همس + تَنَفُّس» phrasing has two phases: همس (gentle, near-silent presence) and تَنَفُّس (the breath that carries off). When dense pressure (ض) is softly breathed off (تَنَفُّس face) and definitively (ء), what remains is emptied of distinction. Same physical exhale, two roles.
Two trilaterals (ظفف, ظفر) and Jabal's binary «الجمع من خارج». But ظُفر (nail, claw) is so canonical and lexicalized that Jabal's binary meaning is almost certainly back-projected from this one famous word. Compositionally: ظ gives edged outward projection (✓ for the nail's hard edge), ف gives parting/opening — neither charge contributes the GATHERING/GRIPPING motion that makes a nail a nail. The grip is a property of the third letter (ر = curl, running-back) and the physical referent. So ظف itself does not have a stable compositional binary reading; it has one lexicalized canonical member that defines the family by retrofit.
Single member ونى = fatigue/cessation. No physical-articulation path from و (sustained link) + ن (resonance) to 'fatigue/cessation' that doesn't depend on a long metaphorical chain. ونى behaves like a lexicalized classical idiom whose meaning is settled by usage rather than by compositional charges. Single-member, semantically isolated.
One methodology, one verdict. Four hundred fifty-three nuclei, each tested by the only thing that matters — the actual words built on it.